OVERSEAS migration movements by,
Filipinos are described to be mostly economic in nature. In an article titled "Statistics on
Filipinos' International Migration: lssues and Steps Towards Harmonizing the Data,"
Opiniano (2007) wrote that "the Philippines is lucky for having a well-placed
government structure that facilitates the international movement of people, and
that statistics on Filipinos' international migration is fairly developed,"
The article cited that gaps are
expected from these, but the basic socio-economic and demographic variables of these international migration statistics
are spelled out.
Addressing the emerging need, the National
Statistics Office conducted the 2011 Survey on Overseas Filipinos (SOF), which
aims to derive national estimates on the number of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs),
and the amount and mode of remittances, in cash and in kind, received by their families. This survey also provides information
about the socio-economic characteristics of the OFWs.
The SOF reported the total number of
overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) who worked abroad at anytime during the period April
to September 20I1 which was estimated at 2.2 million. It jumped by 10 percent from the 2
million recorded in the previous year. Out of
this number, overseas contract workers or those with existing work contracts comprised
95.3 percent of the total OFWs in 2011.
It may be recalled that the term Overseas
Filipino Workers or OFWs was officially adopted under the Ramos Administration to
give recognition to millions of Filipinos who sacrifice by working in other
countries out of a desire to earn better wages. This later on led to a new term balikbayanis - "the new breed of heroes who are
said to be the source of economic stability and empowerment." (De Leon, 2008)
Such remittances vary: some
consisted of cash sent home (73.0 %), others were brought home. (22.3 %), while the rest was remitted
in kind (4.8%).
NSO Administrator Carmeiita N. Ericta said that other cash remittances were
sent through door to door (6.2%), agencies or local offices (4.7%), friends or co-workers
(0.5%) or through other means (16.8%).
The largest total cash remittances
amounting to 82.6 billion pesos were from OFWs working in Asia. She further said that about one in
every three (32.7%) OFWs were laborers and unskilled workers. Around 15.5 percent worked as service workers and
shop and market sales workers. OFWs who worked
as plant and machine operators and assemblers comprised
13.6 percent, trade and related workers, l2.8 percent, and professionals,
10.6 percent.
As indicated in NSO’s report, it appeared that
Saudi Arabia continued to be the Ieading destination of OFWs with 22.6 percent of
the total OFWs working in this country during the period April to September 2011. The other countries in Asia which were
popular destinations of OFWs were United Arab Emirates (14.6%), Qatar (6.9%),
Singapore (6.3%) and Hong Kong (5.3%).
The report further shows that "the
biggest number of OFWs came from CALABARZON, Central Luzon and NCR with i6.5 percent, 14.3
percent and 12.5 percent, respectively of the total OFWs originating from these
regions.
Data show that in 2011
Northern Mindanao posted a 3.5 % of the
total OFW originating from this region. It increased slightly from 3.0 % in 2010, which is very far behind compared to
16.5 % , of CALABARZON and even from that Western Visayas (8.5 %).
Such figures are similarly situated
with the Social Climate report by Mahar Mangahas (first posted 03/25/2011) that
OFW families are slightly over-represented in Metro Manila (15.3 percent), the
Balance of Luzon (15.3 percent), and the Visayas (I4.0 percent). They are under-represented in Mindanao
(9.0 percent)."
Given this set of data, one can
give a number of implications- be it social or economic. However, in the framework of the
Global Pinoy (De Leon, 2008), it illustrates that the modern Juan de la Cruz
has empowered himself to broaden his horizons as he
competes with the citizens of the world.